It seems like the element of fairness is uncommon in today's world of business, when it shouldn't be at all. Think about how commercial debt bureaus work well with people, understanding the amounts that they are owed and how they work to attain said amounts. This is where a focus on the consumer is seen and while a customer base may not always be right, their words should be respected. I think that finalizing a case should be done with the well-being of others in mind.
There should be a sense of fairness in any business and I think that my focus has been on nothing quite as strongly as the video game industry. This is because unlike a majority of commercial debt bureaus, this particular industry does not seem to have its client base in mind. They have to make their profits by working with the people and I can't imagine why a number of companies have cast this idea aside. It seems like other locations should utilize fairness if agencies like Rapid Recovery are glad to do so.
Terrible video game concepts can be seen coming from a mile away, at least that's what I believed at one point. This is because of the fact that EA has paid quite a number of questionable choices, one of them being the structuring of the "SimCity" game which was recently released. It requires a perpetual online connection, so if your Internet goes down, you are all but signed out of your session at that point in time. Why is that these moguls seem to disregard their paying customers while startup organizations take in the words of consumers with open arms?
In fact, a number of companies have taken to Kickstarter, which allows projects to attain funds needed for them to be completed. In return, backers who offer said funds can receive rewards based off of how much they pledge. This is ideal for both sides, especially when you consider that a good amount of communication is seen because of these pages. This allows for more consumer input and the fact that the projects are made better because of it only showcases why independent developers should be supported more often.
I think it's apparent that consumers have to be the target of companies who want to make profits. People wrapped up in this business will understand certain methods better but what remains true is that there's no reason for fairness not to be seen. Commercial debt bureaus are able to perform with this aspect in mind and they are much better off because of it. If this is truly the case, then why is it that so few companies actually put this idea into practice?
There should be a sense of fairness in any business and I think that my focus has been on nothing quite as strongly as the video game industry. This is because unlike a majority of commercial debt bureaus, this particular industry does not seem to have its client base in mind. They have to make their profits by working with the people and I can't imagine why a number of companies have cast this idea aside. It seems like other locations should utilize fairness if agencies like Rapid Recovery are glad to do so.
Terrible video game concepts can be seen coming from a mile away, at least that's what I believed at one point. This is because of the fact that EA has paid quite a number of questionable choices, one of them being the structuring of the "SimCity" game which was recently released. It requires a perpetual online connection, so if your Internet goes down, you are all but signed out of your session at that point in time. Why is that these moguls seem to disregard their paying customers while startup organizations take in the words of consumers with open arms?
In fact, a number of companies have taken to Kickstarter, which allows projects to attain funds needed for them to be completed. In return, backers who offer said funds can receive rewards based off of how much they pledge. This is ideal for both sides, especially when you consider that a good amount of communication is seen because of these pages. This allows for more consumer input and the fact that the projects are made better because of it only showcases why independent developers should be supported more often.
I think it's apparent that consumers have to be the target of companies who want to make profits. People wrapped up in this business will understand certain methods better but what remains true is that there's no reason for fairness not to be seen. Commercial debt bureaus are able to perform with this aspect in mind and they are much better off because of it. If this is truly the case, then why is it that so few companies actually put this idea into practice?
About the Author:
Visit Rapid Recovery Solution if you are searching for more information about commercial debt collection. Also published at How Commercial Debt Bureaus Possess an Uncommon Fairness.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment